<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which convention is more common &#8220;static public function&#8221; or &#8220;public static function&#8221; (based on Symfony and Doctrine)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sznapka.pl/which-convention-is-more-common-static-public-function-or-public-static-function-based-on-symfony-and-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sznapka.pl/which-convention-is-more-common-static-public-function-or-public-static-function-based-on-symfony-and-doctrine/</link>
	<description>About modern web technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: online</title>
		<link>http://blog.sznapka.pl/which-convention-is-more-common-static-public-function-or-public-static-function-based-on-symfony-and-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 07:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sznapka.pl/?p=314#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Dzieki za ciekawy blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dzieki za ciekawy blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.sznapka.pl/which-convention-is-more-common-static-public-function-or-public-static-function-based-on-symfony-and-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sznapka.pl/?p=314#comment-98</guid>
		<description>AFAIK it&#039;s inspired by Java, so Java Coding Conventions should be applied: public, protected, private, abstract, static, final</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK it&#8217;s inspired by Java, so Java Coding Conventions should be applied: public, protected, private, abstract, static, final</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bshafs</title>
		<link>http://blog.sznapka.pl/which-convention-is-more-common-static-public-function-or-public-static-function-based-on-symfony-and-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>bshafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sznapka.pl/?p=314#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Good thinking.  This begs so many questions.  What is the standard for the order of these things?  Is it always abstract public static?  And if so, why?  It seems to me this should be arranged in order of importance, which I would see as &quot;abstract static public&quot;.  Or, if you consider access modifiers should always be declared, then public/protected/private should always come first.  This would look like &quot;private abstract function&quot; or &quot;private abstract static function&quot; which I&#039;ve never seen.  Is there not some sort of Zend coding standard for this issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Good thinking.  This begs so many questions.  What is the standard for the order of these things?  Is it always abstract public static?  And if so, why?  It seems to me this should be arranged in order of importance, which I would see as &#8220;abstract static public&#8221;.  Or, if you consider access modifiers should always be declared, then public/protected/private should always come first.  This would look like &#8220;private abstract function&#8221; or &#8220;private abstract static function&#8221; which I&#8217;ve never seen.  Is there not some sort of Zend coding standard for this issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

